{"id":1381,"date":"2016-12-23T11:39:31","date_gmt":"2016-12-23T15:39:31","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.papaworx.com\/Book\/?page_id=1381"},"modified":"2017-01-31T20:23:32","modified_gmt":"2017-02-01T00:23:32","slug":"5-7","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.stuehlingen.online\/Book\/?page_id=1381","title":{"rendered":"5-7"},"content":{"rendered":"<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"Standard\">Maximilian von Pappenheim continued to collect various taxes from his Jewish subjects and pro forma serfs until his death on February 14, 1639. His first son, Ernst Friedrich, had died in infancy. His second son, Heinrich Ludwig, was killed in the Thirty Years\u2019 War during the siege of Castle Hohenstoffeln by a shot to the head in 1633. His daughter, Maximiliane Maria, died as the young wife of Count Friedrich Rudolf von F\u00fcrstenberg in 1635; the widower thus inherited the title to St\u00fchlingen town and county on behalf of their young son.<\/span><\/p>\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"Standard\">Protection and tax demands continued under F\u00fcrstenberg\u2019s rule, but no new letters of protection were issued for the next fifty-four years.<\/span><\/p>\n<!-- cp_caption_start --><span class=\"captioned_image alignleft\" style=\"width: 400px\"><span id=\"attachment_2771\"  class=\"wp-caption\"><img decoding=\"async\" loading=\"lazy\" class=\"size-full wp-image-2771\" src=\"\/Book\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/01\/ProtectionTax-e1484690514278.png\" alt=\"Protection tax\" width=\"400\" height=\"255\" \/><\/span><small class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6. Number of Jewish households and annual taxes collected per decade.<\/small><\/span><!-- cp_caption_end -->\n<p style=\"text-align: justify;\"><span class=\"Standard\">The data for the diagram in figure 6 has been collated from the various municipal and county records. Since the archival hol\u00addings are in\u00adcomp\u00adlete, ta\u00adking ave\u00adra\u00adges would have un\u00adder\u00adesti\u00admated the actual taxes paid; instead, we have chosen the maximum annual value in each decade. It thus appears that the taxed Jewish population of St\u00fchlingen was relatively stable until the 1660s. It then rose rapidly over the next ten years, partly due to coming of age of the third generation, and partly due to immigration, possibly as an after-effect of the Thirty Years\u2019 War. The majority of new taxpayers settled in the surrounding villages, but were taxed by the counts of F\u00fcrstenberg, and administered through St\u00fchlingen. Their number exceeded by far the original number of contractual slots. The gentile population of St\u00fchlingen objected vigorously, and in 1671 a new letter of protection was issued that attempted to stem the growth. This letter set the number of protected Jewish households at thirteen plus, at most, one married child, that is, a total of twenty-six households, as well as a cantor and a beadle (<em>Schulklopfer<\/em>). No allowance was made for a rabbi. For the new letter of protection to be issued, the Jews had to make a one-time payment of 500 fl., and in addition the Jews had to assume a debt of 500 fl. to the count. The annual protection tax was raised to 18 fl. plus a plump goose per household.<span class=\"Footnote_20_Reference\"><span class=\"Footnote_20_anchor\" title=\"Footnote: H\u00e4usler, St\u00fchlingen: Vergangenheit und Gegenwart, 155.\"><a id=\"body_ftn21\" href=\"#ftn21\">21<\/a><\/span><\/span> Although the number of Jews stabilized, popular complaints persisted <a class=\"Internet_20_link\" href=\"\/Stuehlingen\/doc.php?d=1281\"> <span class=\"Internet_20_link\">[R1281]<\/span><\/a>. <\/span><\/p>\n<p class=\"Footnote\"><span class=\"footnodeNumber\"><a id=\"ftn21\" class=\"Footnote_20_Symbol\" href=\"#body_ftn21\">21<\/a><\/span>H\u00e4usler, <span class=\"T21\">St\u00fchlingen: \u00a0Vergangenheit und Gegenwart<\/span><span class=\"T23\">, 155.<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Maximilian von Pappenheim continued to collect various taxes from his Jewish subjects and pro forma serfs until his death on February 14, 1639. His first son, Ernst Friedrich, had died in infancy. His second son, Heinrich Ludwig, was killed in the Thirty Years\u2019 War during the siege of Castle Hohenstoffeln by a shot to the [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":0,"parent":1298,"menu_order":67,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"new_page.php","meta":{"footnotes":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.stuehlingen.online\/Book\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1381"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.stuehlingen.online\/Book\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.stuehlingen.online\/Book\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.stuehlingen.online\/Book\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/11"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.stuehlingen.online\/Book\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1381"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.stuehlingen.online\/Book\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1381\/revisions"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.stuehlingen.online\/Book\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1298"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.stuehlingen.online\/Book\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1381"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}