{"id":1112,"date":"2016-12-21T13:57:59","date_gmt":"2016-12-21T17:57:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.papaworx.com\/Book\/?page_id=1112"},"modified":"2017-01-31T20:20:37","modified_gmt":"2017-02-01T00:20:37","slug":"2-6","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.stuehlingen.online\/Book\/?page_id=1112","title":{"rendered":"2-6"},"content":{"rendered":"\"Records<\/span>Figure 3. Number of Records per Decade<\/small><\/span>\n

The process yielded 4826 dated records, ex\u00adtrac\u00adted from 209 sour\u00adce do\u00adcu\u00adments and bro\u00adken down fur\u00adther in\u00adto 10,040 in\u00addi\u00advi\u00addual events, that is, da\u00adted items lin\u00adked to a spe\u00adci\u00adfic mo\u00adni\u00adker. Events do not co\u00adver the pe\u00adriod from 1600 to 1750 even\u00adly (see fig. 3).<\/span><\/p>\n

Undoubtedly, many of the event at\u00adtri\u00adbu\u00adtions to spe\u00adci\u00adfic per\u00adsons are in\u00adcor\u00adrect, and 22% of events la\u00adcking an at\u00adt\u00adri\u00adbu\u00adtion is dis\u00adappoin\u00adting. With a mas\u00adsive ex\u00adpen\u00addi\u00adture of ef\u00adfort it should be pos\u00adsi\u00adble to im\u00adprove these de\u00adfi\u00adcien\u00adcies. But is it worth it? It might pro\u00advide us with a few more in\u00adte\u00adres\u00adting de\u00adtails, but it is un\u00adli\u00adke\u00adly to chan\u00adge the over\u00adall pic\u00adture.<\/span><\/p>\n

Unfortunately, primary sources mentioned males almost exclusively. Nevertheless, it was possible to identify some 46 wives and daughters either by name or at least by that of both husband and father. <\/span><\/p>\n

Despite the large number of events processed, a final yield of 190 identified men and 46 women appears paltry (see table 1). Never the less, it is reassuring that almost 80% of the 10’042 identifies events could be allocated to identified persons.
\n <\/span><\/p>\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Category<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\nNumber of events (name mentioned)<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Named persons in St\u00fchlingen (190 men & 46 women)<\/td>\n7’538<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Designated functionaries, not otherwise identified<\/td>\n14<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Residents of Endingen<\/td>\n14<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Residents of Lengnau<\/td>\n15<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Residents of Gailingen<\/td>\n29<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Residents of Tiengen<\/td>\n108<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Residents of Randegg<\/td>\n41<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Foreign Jews<\/td>\n70<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Unresolved events<\/td>\n2’211<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n

Table 1. Allocation of events.<\/strong><\/p>\n

The method employed resulted both in high redundancy and blind spots. Women, children, and other dependents remain largely invisible. Rabbis, cantors, teachers, and ritual slaughterers were rarely covered by a protection list and were captured in this study only if people engaged in business or fell afoul of the law. Family names started to appear in 1649 for Weil\/Weyl, 1662 for Meyer, 1679 for Gu\u00adge\u00adnum\/Gu\u00adgenheimb, 1680 for Bickert\/Pickert, 1692 for Bloch\/Blokh, and 1704 for Bernheimb. These names could then be assigned retrospectively to patrilineal ancestors and their other descendants in turn. For thirty-six out of the 190 individuals no family name could be identified. <\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The process yielded 4826 dated records, ex\u00adtrac\u00adted from 209 sour\u00adce do\u00adcu\u00adments and bro\u00adken down fur\u00adther in\u00adto 10,040 in\u00addi\u00advi\u00addual events, that is, da\u00adted items lin\u00adked to a spe\u00adci\u00adfic mo\u00adni\u00adker. Events do not co\u00adver the pe\u00adriod from 1600 to 1750 even\u00adly (see fig. 3). Undoubtedly, many of the event at\u00adtri\u00adbu\u00adtions to spe\u00adci\u00adfic per\u00adsons are in\u00adcor\u00adrect, and 22% […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":11,"featured_media":0,"parent":25,"menu_order":16,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","template":"new_page.php","meta":{"footnotes":""},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.stuehlingen.online\/Book\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1112"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.stuehlingen.online\/Book\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.stuehlingen.online\/Book\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/page"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.stuehlingen.online\/Book\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/11"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.stuehlingen.online\/Book\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1112"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.stuehlingen.online\/Book\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/1112\/revisions"}],"up":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.stuehlingen.online\/Book\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/pages\/25"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.stuehlingen.online\/Book\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1112"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}